Home About UsPublicationsForumsConsultingContact Us
Back to Earlier Search Results New Search Logout

Links

CMA Shipping 2011

Marine Money Forums

Marine Money Asia Week

Freshly Minted Newsletter

Marine Finance Dashboard

No Surprises This Quarter Either

On Wednesday, Dealogic released its Bookrunner and MLA Tables for Syndicated Shipping Loans for the 9 months 2009. As expected, total volume and transactions were well down from the prior year. Total deal volume was $25.6 billion in 85 transactions compared to $72.2 billion in 263 transactions over the same period in 2008, confirming what we hear anecdotally. In percentage terms, the nine-month decline was 64.5%, which was less than the quarter over quarter reduction of 73.9% suggesting relief is not yet in sight.

Looking at the changes in the tables from the first half of the year, there was movement in the bookrunner table (figure 1) as Mitsubishi UFJ jumped from 8th place to 1st on the strength of two NYK deals booked at the end of September. This pushed SMBC into 2nd place. In a similar fashion, ING moved from 9th to 3rd on the back of the Bluewater transaction, while BofA Merrill Lynch, which was not even in the top 20 came out of nowhere to finish in 9th place based upon the Tidewater transaction. DnB NOR and Mizuho rounded out the top five finishers. The data is particularly striking in that 9 banks made the top 20 having done only a single transaction.

Continue Reading

Written by: | Categories: Freshly Minted, The Week in Review | October 8th, 2009 | Add a Comment

Deep Sea Supply Signs Letter of Intent to Buy 6 AHTS from Tidewater

The latest company to evolve this month is Norwegian Deep Sea Supply put together by project brokers S&T Energy (based in London, Oslo and Moscow) and Mr. Odd Breivik.  The new company has agreed to acquire six AHTS vessels from Tidewater for a price of $202 million, pending financing.  If the deal goes through, Tidewater will make a healthy financial gain of $80 million. The vessels are KMAR 404 class and were built at Kværner Kleven in 1998-99.
The company has secured, pending other financing, a $100 million facility from Fortis Bank, and it plans to launch a convertible bond of between $17 and $60 million, as well as a private placement to investors of between $64 and $123 million.  Norwegian investment banks ABG Sundal Collier and First Securities, who are running the show, are in London this week for the roadshow, which is to close on March 18.  The company aims to list on the OSE following the completed financing and has a growth strategy that involves the acquisition of more vessels.
Written by: | Categories: Freshly Minted, Mergers & Acquisitions | March 17th, 2005 | Add a Comment

New York Conference Features Shipping Star Power

New York Conference Features Shipping Star Power
Last week’s Hellenic-/Norwegian-American Chambers of Commerce Joint Shipping Conference offered a plethora of luminaries from shipping’s universe. Between OSG’s Morten Arntzen, Teekay’s Sean Day, GenMar’s Peter Georgiopoulos, Tidewater’s Dean Taylor, NCL’s Colin Veitch, BP’s Bob Malone, Heidmar’s Per Heidenreich, Wilh. Wilhelmsen, Leif Hoegh, Navios’ Robert Shaw, Intrepid Shipping’s Richard du Moulin, Free Bulkers George Gourdomichalis, CR Weber’s Basil Mavroleon, Healy & Baillie’s Glen Oxton, and DNV’s Tor Svensen the bulk of the world’s tonnage was well represented.
The theme of the conference was “Shipping without Borders” which transcended from national identity to the impact of new technologies and landed squarely on the challenges of doing business in America.  Or should we say the many challenges of doing business in the (50) States?
Per Heidenreich welcomed the assembled with the observation that “2004 was the most incredible shipping market in history, with Wall Street showing an alarming interest in shipping”.  He reflected that the Norwegians are “awfully quiet” and urged them to learn what “makes the Greeks tick.”
The Greek contingent was happy to comply, with George Gourdomichalis offering the strengths of the Greek approach:  Piraeus as a maritime cluster, a favorable tax climate, and the transition of Greek family-owned operations to corporations.  As a counterpoint, Leif Hoegh underscored the decline in Norwegian shipping, both in the bulk and tanker trades as well as in the yard order book.   He further advocated the Greek regard for shipping:  “When you go to Piraeus, even the taxi drivers know about tankers.  Piraeus is an exhilarating place!” When pressed as to whether the Leif Hoegh company would return to Norway, Mr. Hoegh’s one-word answer was a resounding “No”.
While acknowledging the decline of Norway’s shipping sector, Marianne Lie, Director General of the Norwegian Shipowners’ Association, presented the proposed tax and legislative changes within Norway designed to reinvigorate its maritime industry.  The key word is “proposed”. Tor Svensen of DNV attempted to breach the gap by offering the concept of geographic co-location, while Anthony Argyropoulos, newly at Cantor Fitzgerald, adroitly attributed the Greek interest in the capital markets to their entrepreneurial spirit, without discouraging Norwegian interest.
After an overview of the freight futures market by Robert Shaw of Navios, technological advances in this field were covered by Basil Mavroleon of CR Weber, who helped transition the conference by eliminating borders entirely.  In his call to action on FFA’s (Forward Freight Agreements), Basil reflected “If, as I believe it will, this market continues to strengthen, who, with underlying physical positions can continue to ignore participation in it – surely we must all find a way to engage with it, learn to utilize it to our benefit and play some part in the growth curve”.  Implementation was discussed by Barry Bednar of J. Aron & Company and Tom Even Mortensen of IMAREX.
Wilhelm Wilhelmsen offered a global perspective as the conference’s luncheon keynote speaker. His answer to whether national identity has become irrelevant was a conditional “Yes”. Despite being Norway’s oldest and largest shipping enterprise, only 5% of the company’s employees have Norwegian as their mother tongue, and only a handful of ship calls handled by the company last year were in Norway. He feels that the shipping industry is “almost unwanted by the Norwegian authorities…many (companies) feel strongly that they are literally being kicked out.” Norway is the only major shipping nation that is in decline, with the government “destroying an industry which actually has everything required to ensure good and stable revenues for my country in the future.”
Turning the focus to doing business in the Americas, Sean Day of Teekay pointed to the industry’s image in the financial markets resulting in investor differentiation, and a greater scrutiny on quality of both fleets and management. Mr. Day declared Sarbanes-Oxley a “time sink” and expensive, while acknowledging that Teekay is a foreign filer that complies with US requirements.
Bob Malone of BP Shipping stated that his company’s strategy is to own ships in order to manage risk (against incidents).  He felt the need to regain the public trust by managing the company, and pointed to the benefits gained through compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley.
Peter Georgiopoulos of GenMar struck a profoundly wistful note, reflecting that he used to think shipping connoted yachts, former US President’s wives and opera singers, but quickly learned that the world of shipping revolves around OPA, ISM and SARBOX.  Regulation is making shipping increasingly expensive, and much less desirable.
OSG’s Morten Arntzen lifted everyone’s mood with his list of “Top Ten Challenges Facing Executives of American Shipping Companies Competing Internationally” (including finding an affordable Starbucks coffee in Europe, explaining why a suezmax built in the United States costs $240 million, and repeating “Foreign Corrupt Practices Act” 10 times). Mr. Arntzen demonstrated to the market doomsayers why the tanker industry of today is dramatically different from that of the early 70’s.  He further went on to tout the merits of Sarbanes-Oxley as a significant management tool, and highlighted the benefits accruing to OSG from the recent Job Creation Act of 2004, with its attendant tonnage tax scheme for US-flag shipping.
Dean Taylor of Tidewater reiterated the challenges of doing business in the US amidst extensive and expensive regulation. Mr. Taylor’s remarks were surprisingly dour, considering the profitable condition of Tidewater and their enviable earnings multiple.
Norwegian Cruise Line’s Colin Veitch delivered an overview of how, and why, they decided to pursue a US-flag strategy despite the costs and challenges.  Interestingly, it was Mr. Veitch who called upon industry to be proactive, rather than reactive, about regulation (such as environmental policies).  With his extensive experience in the public sector, perhaps his suggestion to influence perception could inspire action leading to a positive image for shipping??
Last week’s Hellenic-/Norwegian-American Chambers of Commerce Joint Shipping Conference offered a plethora of luminaries from shipping’s universe. Between OSG’s Morten Arntzen, Teekay’s Sean Day, GenMar’s Peter Georgiopoulos, Tidewater’s Dean Taylor, NCL’s Colin Veitch, BP’s Bob Malone, Heidmar’s Per Heidenreich, Wilh. Wilhelmsen, Leif Hoegh, NaviosRobert Shaw, Intrepid Shipping’s Richard du Moulin, Free Bulkers George Gourdomichalis, CR Weber’s Basil Mavroleon, Healy & Baillie’s Glen Oxton, and DNV’s Tor Svensen the bulk of the world’s tonnage was well represented.
The theme of the conference was “Shipping without Borders” which transcended from national identity to the impact of new technologies and landed squarely on the challenges of doing business in America.  Or should we say the many challenges of doing business in the (50) States?
Per Heidenreich welcomed the assembled with the observation that “2004 was the most incredible shipping market in history, with Wall Street showing an alarming interest in shipping”.  He reflected that the Norwegians are “awfully quiet” and urged them to learn what “makes the Greeks tick.”
The Greek contingent was happy to comply, with George Gourdomichalis offering the strengths of the Greek approach:  Piraeus as a maritime cluster, a favorable tax climate, and the transition of Greek family-owned operations to corporations.  As a counterpoint, Leif Hoegh underscored the decline in Norwegian shipping, both in the bulk and tanker trades as well as in the yard order book.   He further advocated the Greek regard for shipping:  “When you go to Piraeus, even the taxi drivers know about tankers.  Piraeus is an exhilarating place!” When pressed as to whether the Leif Hoegh company would return to Norway, Mr. Hoegh’s one-word answer was a resounding “No”.
While acknowledging the decline of Norway’s shipping sector, Marianne Lie, Director General of the Norwegian Shipowners’ Association, presented the proposed tax and legislative changes within Norway designed to reinvigorate its maritime industry.  The key word is “proposed”. Tor Svensen of DNV attempted to breach the gap by offering the concept of geographic co-location, while Anthony Argyropoulos, newly at Cantor Fitzgerald, adroitly attributed the Greek interest in the capital markets to their entrepreneurial spirit, without discouraging Norwegian interest.
After an overview of the freight futures market by Robert Shaw of Navios, technological advances in this field were covered by Basil Mavroleon of CR Weber, who helped transition the conference by eliminating borders entirely.  In his call to action on FFA’s (Forward Freight Agreements), Basil reflected “If, as I believe it will, this market continues to strengthen, who, with underlying physical positions can continue to ignore participation in it – surely we must all find a way to engage with it, learn to utilize it to our benefit and play some part in the growth curve”.  Implementation was discussed by Barry Bednar of J. Aron & Company and Tom Even Mortensen of IMAREX.
Wilhelm Wilhelmsen offered a global perspective as the conference’s luncheon keynote speaker. His answer to whether national identity has become irrelevant was a conditional “Yes”. Despite being Norway’s oldest and largest shipping enterprise, only 5% of the company’s employees have Norwegian as their mother tongue, and only a handful of ship calls handled by the company last year were in Norway. He feels that the shipping industry is “almost unwanted by the Norwegian authorities…many (companies) feel strongly that they are literally being kicked out.” Norway is the only major shipping nation that is in decline, with the government “destroying an industry which actually has everything required to ensure good and stable revenues for my country in the future.”
Turning the focus to doing business in the Americas, Sean Day of Teekay pointed to the industry’s image in the financial markets resulting in investor differentiation, and a greater scrutiny on quality of both fleets and management. Mr. Day declared Sarbanes-Oxley a “time sink” and expensive, while acknowledging that Teekay is a foreign filer that complies with US requirements.
Bob Malone of BP Shipping stated that his company’s strategy is to own ships in order to manage risk (against incidents).  He felt the need to regain the public trust by managing the company, and pointed to the benefits gained through compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley.
Peter Georgiopoulos of GenMar struck a profoundly wistful note, reflecting that he used to think shipping connoted yachts, former US President’s wives and opera singers, but quickly learned that the world of shipping revolves around OPA, ISM and SARBOX.  Regulation is making shipping increasingly expensive, and much less desirable.
OSG’s Morten Arntzen lifted everyone’s mood with his list of “Top Ten Challenges Facing Executives of American Shipping Companies Competing Internationally” (including finding an affordable Starbucks coffee in Europe, explaining why a suezmax built in the United States costs $240 million, and repeating “Foreign Corrupt Practices Act” 10 times). Mr. Arntzen demonstrated to the market doomsayers why the tanker industry of today is dramatically different from that of the early 70’s.  He further went on to tout the merits of Sarbanes-Oxley as a significant management tool, and highlighted the benefits accruing to OSG from the recent Job Creation Act of 2004, with its attendant tonnage tax scheme for US-flag shipping.
Dean Taylor of Tidewater reiterated the challenges of doing business in the US amidst extensive and expensive regulation. Mr. Taylor’s remarks were surprisingly dour, considering the profitable condition of Tidewater and their enviable earnings multiple.
Norwegian Cruise Line’s Colin Veitch delivered an overview of how, and why, they decided to pursue a US-flag strategy despite the costs and challenges.  Interestingly, it was Mr. Veitch who called upon industry to be proactive, rather than reactive, about regulation (such as environmental policies).  With his extensive experience in the public sector, perhaps his suggestion to influence perception could inspire action leading to a positive image for shipping??
Written by: | Categories: Forums, Freshly Minted | February 17th, 2005 | Add a Comment
Copyright 2008. Marine Money. All Rights Reserved.