Home About UsPublicationsForumsConsultingContact Us
Back to Earlier Search Results New Search Logout

Links

CMA Shipping 2011

Marine Money Forums

Marine Money Asia Week

Freshly Minted Newsletter

Marine Finance Dashboard

Comparative TCE Earnings Analysis

By David J. Saginaw of McQuilling Services, LLC

During any given period the relative health of the tanker freight spot market, and the corresponding general well-being of tanker owners, is typically assessed by a review of the average time charter equivalent (TCE) earnings, expressed in $/day for the period for a given class of tankers. As is well understood by industry watchers and participants, this parameter is arrived at by transforming spot market rates expressed in terms of Worldscale to daily rates expressed in terms of ($/day) through simple voyage economics calculations. In the general case, these calculations assume a round trip voyage assumption, that is, a ballast voyage transit from the discharge port to the load port and a laden voyage transit from the load port to the discharge port.

In certain tanker sectors (Handy, Products, Panamax), owners and operators have historically scheduled vessels such that ballast legs are reduced through triangulation or backhauls or other techniques commonly referred to as ‘tramping”. More recently, these techniques have been more and more frequently applied in the deployment of larger vessels, up to and including VLCC’s. Therefore, it is likely, and more so now than in the past, that the assumption of round trip voyage economics in transforming spot market rates to TCE’s understates the actual earnings implied by spot market levels. In short, while tanker spot freight markets are anything but healthy at the moment, things may not be as bad as they appear for tanker owners and may actually be quite a bit better than supposed. As described above, this is because actual vessel voyage histories reflect more optimized routing than that implied by round trip assumptions.

Given the nature of our industry and the understandable reluctance for full disclosure by the tanker owning community, demonstrating proof of this has been difficult. Thanks to reporting standards required of companies listed on U.S. stock exchanges and recent listings of a reasonable cross-section of tanker companies, quantitative data is now available to investigate whether actual earnings levels exceed those implied by spot market levels. Continue Reading

Written by: | Categories: Uncategorized | May 1st, 2002 | Add a Comment

Oil Production and Tanker Rates

The preceding article is oddly comforting. Its highly unlikely that the system supporting the oil supply/demand dynamic will change radically in the near term because the regimes of the OPEC 10 all rely on the stability of the income to maintain their regimes. Yes the dynamic of increased Russian production and the political turmoil we now face does impact the equation, but the fact that most of the region; while a portion of the populace resents the cultural implications of such and is on this tyrannical tact today; is better off maintaining this economic relationship with the West, not going to war over it.

The target range for the OPEC basket, now about $22-27/bbl, has little or nothing to do with optimizing profit and a lot to do with poli-economic survival. If the price drops too low, services for the populace of the producer states suffer and coups become a distinct possibility; too high and the consumer nations will activate their idle wells, of which there are plenty, then seek alternative sources and finally work even harder on alternative fuels.

Continue Reading

Written by: | Categories: Uncategorized | May 1st, 2002 | Add a Comment
Copyright 2008. Marine Money. All Rights Reserved.