Last week, we reported on the launching of Seaspan Corporation’s preferred stock issue, which priced last Friday. The company sold 10 million shares of its 9.50% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares, par value $0.01 per share, liquidation preference $25.00 per share. Net proceeds to the issuer were $241,250,000. Details of the transaction are shown below in the Guts of the Deal.
On Wednesday, Seaspan Corporation, utilizing its $1billion shelf registration, filed a preliminary prospectus supplement for a public offering of its Series C Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Preferred Shares”). The number of shares being offered was not disclosed; however, the liquidation preference is $25 per share. Proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes, which may include vessel acquisitions or investments. Pending the application of funds for these purposes, the company may prepay a portion of its outstanding debt under certain of its revolvers. Following the offering, Seaspan intends to file an application to list the shares on the New York Stock Exchange.
China’s inflation and Ireland’s banking crisis triggered this week’s market volatility. Nevertheless, Scorpio Tankers Inc. and Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation (“NMA”) moved ahead with equity follow-on offerings. Scorpio’s registration was for a one-off transaction, whereas Navios’ was a supplement to its recently filed broad shelf registration.
While the action in bonds this week continued in Norway, New York joined the fray with Ship Finance’s latest offering. The beauty of Norway’s market is its speed and simplicity but Wall Street is the place for longer tenor dollar denominated deals such as Ship Finance’s ten year senior unsecured offering.
With the IPO market for shipping shares quiescent since March, Costamare Inc. broke the ice last week and filed its F-1 to begin the process of an initial public offering of its shares. The company is offering 13.3 million shares, which will represent 22.1% of the shares outstanding immediately after the offering, without giving effect to the green shoe. The expected price range is $15 to $17. Assuming pricing at the midpoint, gross proceeds will approximate $213 million and the market value of the company will be $965 million. Proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes and potential future acquisitions. The company may also use a portion of the net proceeds, together with debt financing, to fund it’s already contracted containership acquisitions. Finally, pending any of the preceding, the proceeds may be applied to temporarily reduce outstanding indebtedness. The company intends to pay a quarterly dividend of $0.25/share, which is based upon a payout ratio of 60% to 70% of distributable cash flow. This equates to a yield of 6.25% on the midpoint price. More details on the transaction are included in our Guts of the Deal shown below.
Back in April, we wrote the following:
“Stripping off the baggage of its container ships and chassis, both unattractive businesses today, Seacastle Inc. has offered the public the opportunity to invest this time in its container leasing subsidiary through an initial public offering of that business, which they have named SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd. This is another example of a part that might be worth more than a whole as management recognized the recent outperformance of the publicly traded container leasing companies, Textainer and TAL International due to operating leverage. Trade has begun to resume which equates to more boxes coming on line, higher utilization and hence more revenue, with little incremental cost. In addition, given the financial constraints of the liner companies due to a very difficult 2009, it is likely that the lines will increase the portion of leased rather than owned containers in their fleet. From that standpoint, timing could not be better.”
Marine Money Capital Market League Tables Highlight
DnB NOR, Deutsche, Citi and Jefferies
Marine Money’s survey of the global banking community in the spring told a dramatic story. Banks prefer lending to and doing business with public shipping companies. Transparency, performance and the simple fact that public company managements with their access to capital have been among the most active in the business – that activity of course translates into fees – makes the case that capital markets access and execution capability are important skills. We celebrate here the Capital Markets performance of the leading Wall Street banks and their first half contributions to the shipping community.
Continue Reading
Our Chairman’s promotions are sheer artistry and we constantly marvel at these masterful gems. Of course, there are issues with punctuation but why let that get in the way of a great pitch. The amazing thing is that despite his protests otherwise, he really does get it. Our problem is that he is rubbing off on us and we are moving from analytical and objective to the dark side where it’s all about the love as both Matt and he are fond of saying. In the case of this year’s Marine Money week, there is no doubt we got it right. The numbers speak for themselves. This year we went out on a limb denoting the theme as the Comeback or Confidence Returns to Ship Finance. Whether or not that was the case and we believe it is, 1,078 registered guest wanted to hear the answer. This was a new record surpassing 2008’s 1042 guests. Uncertainty + optimism trump a boom.
We relish the awards afternoon. We devote a great deal of energy, although far less than the dealmakers themselves, in choosing the transactions from the many submissions we receive and it is a pleasure to see the winners bask in the recognition they rightfully deserve. It is also educational as the latest structures and ideas are on display for all to see and take advantage of as appropriate. Nigel Thomas and Dan Rodgers of Watson, Farlay & Williams did a masterful job moderating the session which included presentations by Sheldon Goldman, Efthymios Bouloutas of Marfin, Ronny Bjornadal of Nordea, Sean Durkin of NSF, Gerrit Parker of Citi and Craig Fuehrer of Deutsche Bank.
Continue Reading
Any concerns the market or we had with respect to volatility and uncertainty in the markets were put to rest last Thursday when General Maritime priced its follow-on offering. While being an established company was key, we also noted the positive trend in the share price as both the vessel acquisition and follow-on offering were announced. The result was in our estimation remarkable. Described as a blowout, the deal was over 2 times oversubscribed with all the shares purchased by institutional buyers Due to demand, the deal was upsized by 20% and yet no one received their full allocation. Moreover, from a pricing perspective, the shares were discounted by the typical 4.5% from the day’s closing price. While the transaction was accretive and positive in the long run, the results were a strong vote of confidence in Peter G. and his entire team.
Like the earlier high yield offering, it had to be done and the whole world knew it (the downside of transparency), not a favorable position for any seller. Yet Genmar’s team of bankers together with management clearly overcame that problem raising net proceeds of $195.6 million (exclusive of the green shoe), which when combined with the proceeds of the credit facility provided available financing totaling $567.6 million and therefore a funding gap of $52.4 million based upon the agreed purchase price of $620 million. However given the demand for the shares it is a near certainty that the green shoe will be exercised generating further gross proceeds of ~$31million making the gap easily manageable.
Continue Reading
General Maritime pulled out all the stops retaining a litany of Wall Street’s bankers to assist in the sale of its common stock needed to complete the financing of five VLCCS and two newbuilding Suezmax tankers from Metrostar. Debt financing is in the process of being arranged, with Nordea and DnB NOR, in the amount of $372 million, representing 60% of the purchase price. The facility is conditioned upon a successful equity offering to make up the remaining balance of $248 million plus any working capital needed. In this period of volatility in the markets, this is no simple deal. Adding further complications was S&P’s recent downgrade of the company’s debt to a B rating. This rating however needs to be put in the context of S&P’s overall view of shipping, which considers Teekay and OSG as BB and BB- rated respectively a few notches above Genmar’s.
Continue Reading