We do not believe that the recently announced five year bareboat charter by Seaspan Corporation of two of the former Maersk 4,800 TEU vessels to MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company (“MSC”) received the attention it warrants for the lessons it offers. On the surface, this financial transaction solves a number of key concerns associated with these non-core vessels by effectively removing them from Seaspan’s fleet by transferring both operating and residual risk to MSC. There was a price, as a loss was incurred ($8.9 million on the first two vessels), and to understand what went wrong and if this latest transaction salvages the overall experience, we will attempt a difficult post-mortem.
But in all things context is important. Bear in mind that this analysis focuses on four out of 69 on the water vessels or $160 million out of total assets of $63 billion. In short, this transaction must be considered in the context of Seaspan’s entire “investment” portfolio which requires careful management and a focus on overall results rather than piecemeal transactions.
Market reports suggest that A.P Moller Maersk has postponed a planned EUR 1 billion bond issue due to poor market conditions. Led by Barclays, ING, J.P. Morgan, Mitsubishi and Nordea, the roadshow for the 10-year bond was to have begun on May 31 but never transpired. Analysts attribute the delay to a poor corporate bond market which is struggling with the Greek debt crisis among other issues. Following its desire to diversify its funding sources, Maersk has been a recent and regular visitor to the bond market beginning with its debut in 2009, a 750 million Euro issue. This was quickly followed by a NOK 4 billion issue and last November by a 500 million Euro 7-year issue. No worries here as the markets will certainly right themselves and in the meanwhile we are certain Maersk has sufficient liquidity to meet its needs.
Having had its first taste last year, A.P. Moller-Maersk (“APM”) returned to the public bond market a couple of weeks ago, issuing EUR 500 million of 7-year bonds with a coupon of 4.375%. The net proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes. Unsurprisingly, investor interest was strong with the bonds being more than three times oversubscribed. As a point of comparison, last year’s issue of EUR 750 million 5-year bonds carried a coupon of 4.875%. Placed by Barclays Capital, BNP Paribas, Danske Bank, HSBC and RBS, the bonds will be listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange.
We might. While the data may be considered slim and possibly distorted by the $6.75 billion A.P Moller-Maersk transaction, the nine-month 2010 Dealogic shipping data intimates a reversal in the downward trend in syndicated lending which began in 2007. Not only were the number of syndicated deals, volume and new money higher, club deal volume and numbers were down. The latter of course might just reflect deal size, where five of the top fifteen deals were in excess of $1 billion, but we will give the data the benefit of the doubt. In terms of specifics, the number and volume of deals for the 9-months of 2010 was 110 deals totaling $28.4 billion versus the one year earlier total of 90 deals totaling $25.9 billion. The best way to see the trend over time is to look at the data, which we show pictorially below. And, yes, you needn’t remind us that one point does not make a trend.
This week Dealogic published its first half 2010 Bookrunner and MLA Tables for Syndicated Shipping Loans and the news was still dismal but in some respects hopeful. In terms of the big picture, while dollar volumes continued their downward trend, the number of deals in the first half actually increased slightly indicative of, perhaps, less capacity or more focused lending. While the number of club deals increased slightly, from 19 to 23, the deal value declined in proportion to total volume intimating at the revival of the larger syndications. And finally, approximately 90% of the dollar volume was new business rather than refinancings, which is indicative of an improving credit market. Illustrative data are shown graphically herein.
But, for our readers, it is truly the standings that matter as they represent a scorecard of their performance for the first half of the year. While there was shifting in the standings compared to a year ago, the bookrunner table remained relatively stable. Mitsubishi UFJ displaced its fellow Japanese bank, SMBC for the pole position, while DnB NOR moved into second pushing Nordea into the 4th spot. Outsiders from a year ago, Credit Agricole CIB and ABN AMRO found spots in the top ten this time around. In terms of number of deals, DnB and Mizuho had a substantial lead recording 9 and 8 deals respectively far outpacing the remaining bookrunners. Finally, market share is clearly more concentrated at the top compared to the comparable period last year.
Continue Reading
In 2009, the equity markets had a roller coaster run, but some shipping companies found windows of opportunity for share placements, often tied to debt reduction. Self help through raising equity capital for balance sheet recapitalization is one way to ride through the difficult times. There had been varying degrees of success and among the most notable would be Neptune Oriental Lines’ (“NOL”) USD 972 million rights issue in June and NYK’s recently concluded JPY 116.4 billion (USD 1.3 billion) global equity offering. Continue Reading
This week, we are impressed to see another shipyard finding success in the IPO market. This makes India’s Pipavav Shipyard the third successful shipbuilder to raise equity following Taiwan’s China Shipbuilding Corporation and Malaysia’s TAS Offshore since the beginning of this year.
Pipavav Shipyard will soon be listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange and National Stock Exchange upon the completion of its book building. The private shipyard has offered its shares at a price band of Rs 55 – 60 a piece and plans to raise between Rs 4.7 billion (USD 98 million) and Rs 510 billion (USD 106 million). This amount is significantly lesser than the USD 200 million it had previously planned when the shipyard registered its IPO during the first quarter of 2008. Out of the 85.45 million shares on offer, 2.6 million shares have been set aside for the employees. We have provided a summary of the transaction in the Guts of the Deal table that follows. JM Financial Consultants, Citigroup Global Markets India, Enam Securities and SBI Capital Markets are the appointed bookrunners for this IPO. Continue Reading
Rumors in the market are rife about a new massive financing arranged for A.P. Moller Maersk (“APM”). According to Dealogic, the banks involved, as is customary, have reported to them that APM has entered into a $6.5 billion 7 year credit facility. In fact, as an industry source suggests, and Dealogic confirms, this is an old deal in the same amount that has been amended. And, as such, there is no new money involved.
In a precautionary move, given the uncertain credit markets, the amended transaction has been structured as a forward start facility. Upon expiry of the existing facility, the new one commences. In this instance, the start date is in 2012. The mandated lead arrangers on both include Citi, Danske Bank, HSBC, JPMorgan, Mitsubishi UFJ and Nordea.